10 February, 2014

It's funny how sometimes ideas need time to fully take hold, and turn from concepts into tangible actions.  I've spent countless hours reading about nutrition, and studying what other people do, not to mention the time I've put into experimenting on myself.  I've just recently started to really get things right.

The process

During the twelve week challenge I did last summer I lost a lot of weight and was looking pretty thin by the end of it.  So what was the problem?  Firstly, I became a neurotic fool, thinking about food all the time, counting calories, weighing food, avoiding social situations where I would be "forced" to stray from my path.  Secondly, by the end of it I felt too thin.  In fact, one of my good friends commented on my "Christian Bale look"...sadly, he may have been referring to the Christian Bale from "The Machinist" look.

Lessons Learned

The way I see it, the whole problem with counting calories, and obsessing over details, is that it put me into a mindset of "what can I get away with?"  Knowing that I could eat x-amount of calories led me to try to find creative ways of eating as much as I could without going over my "calorie limit".  Dieting boils down to eating less food. Counting calories  led me to try to eat the maximum amount within the confines of the diet.  These are conflicting thought processes, and it is a recipe for failure.

Feeling too thin, was a good problem for me, but it was a problem nonetheless.  My body changed fast, and my mind was not able to keep up.  I've been a bigger guy my whole life, and suddenly feeling very thin was a strange experience.  After the twelve weeks were over, I gained back a bit of weight, but remained leaner than before the start of the experiment.  I have maintained that size very easily since, and just recently have decided to focus on losing fat again.  I think that this mental aspect of losing weight is often overlooked.  Imagine someone going from obese to lean in a short amount of time.  This is going to require a complete lifestyle overhaul.  Habits will have to change, the way you think about food will have to change, and you will have to get used to looking at a new person in the mirror.  Even if this new person looks good, you still need time to recognize that the new person is you.

What Next

I have gotten used to seeing a thinner Dave in the mirror, and finally feel mentally prepared to see a super lean Dave.  I've also built a decent amount of muscle in the interim, which will hopefully mitigate some of the "scrawny" feelings I had before.

Later this week, I'll post details about what I've come up with to lose weight without spending my free time drooling over low carb dessert recipes...because that is just not cool.


Posted on Monday, February 10, 2014 by Unknown

No comments

28 October, 2013

It seems to be a part of human nature to latch onto something you believe in, and reject anything that opposes or doesn't exactly fit with your beliefs.  I know all about it, I'm stubborn as hell. People are so dogmatic about such silly things sometimes. The result of all this stubborn dogmatism is that opinions become polarized, and the middle ground is an incredibly treacherous zone, where people from both sides are firing at will.


There was an article floating around on the internet a few weeks ago about how crossfit can kill you.  There is a medical condition called rhabdomyolysis, that is caused by an excessive breakdown of muscle tissue.  When you exercise you cause micro-damage to muscle fibers, the healing process then rebuilds the muscle, hopefully bigger and stronger than it was previously.  When the muscle is broken down some proteins are released into the blood stream.  If too much muscle damage is caused, too much of this protein (called myoglobin) gets in the blood and screws up the kidneys.  It can be deadly if it is bad enough.  So, can crossfit kill you?  Sure.  If you are insane.

The article told the story of a woman who was hospitalized with rhabdomyolysis after an intense crossfit workout, and it created a huge stir.  Not surprisingly, the two warring factions came out to either support crossfit, or wave the I-told-you-so banners.  No middle ground.




Crossfit is the only way to exercise.  Carbs make you fat.  Fat makes you fat.  Lifting weights is the only way to build muscle.  Bodyweight exercises are the best way to build muscle.  Running will kill you.  Running is the only way to lose fat.  Do a search for anything related to exercise and nutrition.  I guarantee that you will find two groups of people that have their sights trained on the other side and are just waiting to pull the trigger.

Moderation, where are you?  Crossfit is awesome, in moderation.  Carbs are healthy in moderation.  Fats are healthy in moderation.  Incorporate a little bit of each into your life and see if you don't feel better.  I routinely have days where I eat lots of rice, sweet potatoes, and a maybe even some evil-gluten-laden-bakery treats. That's right, gluten- the Antichrist of the nutrition world.  People have really latched onto the "gluten is the root of all evil" way of thinking.  Gluten is bad, if you are gluten intolerant, which very few people are.  That doesn't mean that donuts are good for you, but having a donut once in a while will not turn you into Jabba the Hut overnight.  

I love lifting weights, but I also want to be able to walk on my hands, and do some gymnastics movements, so I throw crossfit style workouts into the mix, and do bodyweight exercises alongside weight training.  Being strong and also able to move athletically sems like a sensible combination. For some reason though, this approach to exercise is considered blasphemous by many people in the exercise world.  Pick a side, and proudly wave the flag.

Critical Thinking

Human beings have brains.  We are able to rationalize, conceptualize, and come to conclusions based on evidence.  Give yourself a pat on the back, you have evolved to think critically. The alternative is to revert back to being a turd chucking chimpanzee, and throw shit-balls at anyone who does not completely agree with your point of view.

Knowing that this polarization of information exists, you have to be able to look at things critically.  Take this "crossfit will kill you" article for instance.  You are probably aware of the fact that exercise is generally considered to be a healthy endeavor.  You know that there are two opposing opinions regarding crossfit (and any type of exercise) as a good way to get healthy and fit.  Finally, you also know that people have a tendency to do things to extremes.  So, what is the actual message contained in the article?  It could be that the author hates crossfit, the woman in the story pushed herself way to hard, and you can do crossfit without ever being hospitalized.

Middle Ground

Please come join me in the middle ground where it is ok to lift weights, do crossfit, jog, do hill sprints, eat paleo, eat carbs, and even (God-forbid) eat a donut or slice of cheesecake from time to time.  Just don't do anything extreme and always think about what you are doing.  Simple concept but surprisingly difficult.  I want to be part of a community of like minded people where dogmatism is trumped by combining the best aspects of many different approaches. Welcome to the middle ground!

Posted on Monday, October 28, 2013 by Unknown

No comments

11 October, 2013

I'm still not sure why, but the post I wrote about being a fat loss scientist continues to be the most popular thing on this blog. It's an idea that I really believe in. Taking control of your own health and fitness, and not relying on other people's experience for everything. It's your body after all.

Experimenting with different foods and ways of eating is fun, and also a great way to find out what makes you feel your best. My latest experiments have included bulletproof coffee, and eating paleo. I hate that name, by the way, so let's just say eating real food.  One was an epic fail, the other a huge success and a big help in reaching my goals.

Bulletproof Coffee

Bulletproof coffee was the fail. There is a good reason why though. When you read about bulletproof coffee, it's presented in a way that claims that the rules of caloric balance don't apply to grass fed butter, and coconut oil. The fact that I bought into this is slightly embarrassing, to say the least. I gained a lot of fat super fast. Something to the tune of 1kg per week.  But here's why. People are losing weight with bulletproof coffee because they are using it as a stepping stone into the world of intermittent fasting. Replacing breakfast with fatty coffee. This lets you consume fewer calories, and more than likely you would be replacing processed carbs (aka healthy breakfast foods) with good healthy fats. That's a perfect switch. In my case though, I went from completely fasting to drinking a 500 calorie cup of coffee. Not such a great trade. The rules of caloric balance apply, the nice new layer of fat on my stomach is proof.

I still think that the concept of replacing breakfast with a cup of fatty coffee is a wonderful idea for the majority of people.  The effect of most breakfast foods on your body is less than desirable, and most people aren't eating enough healthy fat.  But, you have to remember that at the end of the day things need to balance out.

Real Food

Eating real foods, and thinking about the way people ate thousands of years ago has been a great revelation.  This concept gets a big thumbs up in my books.  My take on it differs slightly from the hardcore paleo people though.  There are two major differences.  

The first is this.  Just because a food is "natural" doesn't mean it's natural to eat frequently or in large quantities.  The best example is nuts.  Almonds are healthy, and natural.  But, when in history have people been able to go out and buy large bags of pre-shelled roasted almonds?  If you had to shell them yourself, you'd eat three, give up, kill a bear, and chow down.  Killing a bear would probably be easier than cracking those damn things open. Being so easy to eat makes them incredibly easy to overeat.  I will have some now and then, but view them more as a treat.  A delicious, addictive treat.

The second difference has to do with realistically looking at my goals.  I want to look amazing, and be as strong as humanly possible.  Paleolithic people didn't care about squatting heavy weight and having low body fat. I care about these things.  So, I make exceptions.  After I lift heavy weights I eat lots of carbs.  These carbs could be from sweet potatoes, jasmine rice, or even evil-gluten-laden-bread from time to time.  These are not "paleo foods", but I don't have "paleo goals". It makes sense to me.


I think that experimenting with food choices, and even dabbling with "fads" like bulletproof coffee is great fun.  I learn more and more each time I try something new.  The funny thing is, the more I figure out, arguably the hard way, the more I realize that eating meat and vegetables, and throwing in some carbs after heavy weight lifting sessions, is what makes me feel the best.  There is nothing fancy or cutting edge about this.  Don't buy into the idea of super foods, or fast fat loss diets.  Just eat real food, and be healthy.  I truly believe that it's better to think of fat loss as a by product of good health.  Eat real foods most of the time, and be conscious about what is truly a healthy food choice.  I assure you that if you eat a bag of 'healthy" almonds every day you will get fat.  In my case it's the cashews I have to watch out for.  I will eat the whole bag.

My challenge for you is to experiment.  Try something, anything really.  Take bread out of your diet and see how you feel.  Or try to eat two cups of leafy greens every day, see if you start poopin like a champ.  Just try something different, and see what it does for YOU.  Let me know what you try, and how it works.




Posted on Friday, October 11, 2013 by Unknown

No comments

17 September, 2013

American science writer Gary Taubes is pissing off a lot of people in the nutrition industry.  He has written a few books, but his two bestsellers Good Calories, Bad Calories and Why We Get Fat have made him given him a nice bit of notoriety   I'd say there are a lot of nutrition professionals that really wish he would just go away.  He has theorized that the entire approach to fat loss and health that nutrition professionals have touted for the past fifty years is completely wrong.  The thing is, he makes a damn good case.  I'm going to write a few blog posts that summarize some of the main points from his books.  I highly recommend his books, and in particular Why We Get Fat.  Good Calories, Bad Calories is a little heady on the science, but Why We Get Fat is really an approachable and enjoyable read.

Just so you know, I am not claiming this to be the new gospel of fat loss and health.  This is just a different theory that seems to me to have some valid points.  There are some things that aren't explained by the standard nutritional norms.  I want to look at these questions from all the different angles. The first point I want to cover is the idea we have that being fat is related to wealth.  Poor people should be thin right?  If there isn't much food, how could you possible get fat?

Taubes has a huge list of examples of groups of people that went from being wealthy (as in abundance of good food) to being dirt poor, and got fat in the process.  Here are some of the examples he gives.

Pima Indians

The Pima are a group of Native Americans living in Southern Arizona.  In 1846 American soldiers travelling through the area wrote about the abundance of food. They had so much food, that they were able to supply the military with provisions during the Mexican-American War.  The soldiers also remarked about the strong physiques, and vibrant health of the people.

Fast forward to the early 1900's and things were quite different.  The US claimed the land that the Pima's lived on, and confined the Pima to reservations to ease tensions between the Natives, and Euroamerican settlers.  They were no longer able to maintain their own food supply, and were forced to begin relying on government rations.  They went from food abundance to severe food scarcity within fifty years.  And guess what happened.  They got super fat.  The years of famine made them obese.  Today the Pima have the highest incidence of Type II diabetes in the world.

Sioux Indians

In the 1920's, economics researchers from the University of Chicago visited a group of Sioux Indians living on the Crow Creek Reservation in South Dakota.  They found that the people were "poor beyond imagination" and that they were living on bread and coffee.  The researchers observed the following about the body composition of the people on the reservation.


                                         Women                  Men               Children                  
Distinctly Fat                     40%                   25%                   10%
Extremely Thin                  20%                   25%                   25%

How can there be so many fat people, when they were obviously extremely poor?  The other weird phenomenon is having so many fat people and so many extremely thin people in a community where everyone is living on rations.

Trinidadians

In the 1960's Trinidad was suffering from widespread malnutrition.  The US sent a group of nutritionists to the country in an attempt to help out.  The nutritionists found that even though people were dying from malnutrition and deficiency related diseases, over one-third of women older than twenty five were obese.  Obviously confused by this conflicting scenario, MIT got involved and went down to quantify the diet of these obese women.  The number they got was around 2000 kcal a day, with fat making up around 20% of the diet.  Not the sort of caloric intake that should result in obesity.

Slums of Sao Paulo Brazil

Benjamin Caballero is a public health professor from John Hopkins University.  In 2005 he published an article titled "A Nutrition Paradox - Underweight and Obesity in Developing Countries", in which he describes his findings from a visit to public health clinics in the slums of Sao Paolo Brazil. What he found was that the majority of the families with one overweight family member also had one underweight family member.  They called these families "dual burden families".  From a public health perspective, some members of the family need to go on a diet, and some members of the family need to eat more.  This is definitely a paradox.  So, their question was "How can we make more food available to these undernourished children, without making their parents fatter?"

What is Going On Here?

There are many other examples of poverty and obesity coexisting.  In his book, Taubes has a list of about a dozen communities that were studied in an attempt to make sense of this strange phenomenon.  You can probably think of examples of this from your own life.  I used to work at a grocery store, and I clearly remember that the people who looked the poorest, were typically the fattest, and they would come to the checkout with piles of crap food.  The reason being that, unfortunately, junk food is cheaper than healthy nutrient rich food. In Why We Get Fat, the majority of the examples given have one thing in common, the presence of obesity and malnutrition in the same communities, and often in the same families.  It doesn't make much sense.

In Why We Get Fat, Taubes has an interesting point. "The co-existence of thin, stunted children...with mothers who are themselves overweight, doesn't pose a challenge to the public health system, it poses a challenge to our beliefs" he says. Think about this for a second.  Fat mom, skinny little undernourished kid.  Is Mom really taking food away from her own child, so that she can get fatter?  We know enough about maternal instincts to know that this is an impossibility.  So, why are there so many instances of fat parents with malnourished children?

The question I'm stuck with is this.  How is it possible for some people to get fat in the midst of famine and malnutrition?  Is it really as simple as calories in vs calories out?  How big a factor does food type and quality play?  

 Speaking from my own experience, I've found that lately I'm losing fat by eating more calories...a lot more calories.  The key for me has been removing all processed foods, and keeping carbs really low.  The most important thing is that I feel much healthier.  This is exactly the same conclusion that Taubes arrives at through the course of his research.  He does a good job explaining it too.  I am going to share more about  this soon, as well as more about my personal experimentation.  


Posted on Tuesday, September 17, 2013 by Unknown

No comments

11 September, 2013

So there is this phenomenon called "bulletproof living" that is incredibly popular in certain circles on the internet.  It all started with a guy named Dave Asprey, who is a self proclaimed "bio-hacker" and a very successful entrepreneur living in Silicon Valley.  What the hell is "bio-hacking", right?  Well according to him, it is finding tricks to "optimize and upgrade your biology".  He lost over 100 lbs, and apparently increased his IQ by over 20 points through hacking his own biology.

It all sounds slightly ridiculous, and I fully understand the doubt.  When I first read about it I thought he was off his rocker too.  One of his most popular bio-hacks is something called bulletproof coffee (I know it still sounds ridiculous).  Bulletproof coffee is coffee with lots of healthy fats added in.  I heard about this and thought it sounded interesting, but because I was doing my 12 Week Challenge, I was hesitant to add in all the extra fat calories.  But, those days are gone.  Bring on the fats!

Now, every morning I make a nice big cup of bulletproof coffee.  I make the coffee, then throw in a couple
tablespoons of butter, a few tablespoons of coconut oil, and fire the whole mix in the blender.  The end result is a creamy, delicious, coconutty masterpiece.  The flavor alone is reason enough for you to go and try this immediately.

But, what about all this bio-hacking business?  Well the science, in a very simplified explanation is this.

1.  Coconut oil and good quality grass-fed butter have lots of healthy fats.
2. The brain is composed mainly of fats, and needs healthy fats to function.
3. Caffeine helps the fats get into the brain.
4. The fats slow the absorption of caffeine.


You end up with lots of excellent brain fuel getting into the brain more easily, as well as the mental focus and energy of caffeine but without the huge energy spike.  When I drink a regular coffee I get a ton of energy, sometimes too much, for a couple of hours and then it's done.  With the bulletproof coffee I feel calm, focused, and energized for five or six hours, and never crash afterwards.  And it's just so damn tasty.
The other benefit of bullet proof coffee is that it is very filling. It is actually a sneaky way to do intermittent fasting. Fat doesn't affect insulin, so you can eat fat, fuel your brain, and still get the fat burning effects of intermittent fasting.

Give it a shot. Get some coffee, grass fed butter (Anchor if you live in Asia, Kerrygold in North America), coconut oil (or MCT oil if you can find it), and blend them together.  I'd love to hear if it works for you like it does for me.  Let's try to stay away from calling ourselves bio-hackers though, that's just weird.

Posted on Wednesday, September 11, 2013 by Unknown

1 comment

02 September, 2013

Leaky gut syndrome.  Sounds gross right? Well it is, but probably not in the way you are thinking. It's leaky gut syndrome, not leaky butt. No poop in this post.

Leaky gut syndrome is a medical condition where undigested bits of food, and toxins are able to pass through the lining of your stomach and intestines and get into your blood. In a healthy gut, there are lots of bacteria that allow us to digest food properly. When there aren't enough of these little guys, food and toxins are able to leak through and get into your blood.  The thing is, almost all of us have this problem to some degree.

What happens when you get the gut leaks? A lot of bad things. Research into this subject is still somewhat new, but it has been suggested that conditions ranging from food allergies and rashes, all the way to autism and ADD/ADHD may be the result of a leaky gut.

Why are our guts so messed up? It pretty much boils down to how badly our food supply has been screwed with, and our over reliance on antibiotics. The bacteria in our guts are the "biotics" that the drugs we take are "anti-ing". Antibiotics work by indiscriminately wiping out all the bacteria in your gut, and in fact it's usually the good bacteria that get killed first. So after taking antibiotics, or eating them from hormone loaded meats, your gut has no protection. Throw some pesticides and herbicides into the mix, and all of a sudden you have a sieve instead of a stomach lining, and a laundry list of toxins having a pool party in your blood.

What can we do? This can be reversed with a sensible diet that is full of good bacteria. You may want to supplement with probiotics too. I've started trying to heal my own gut, after noticing a mild allergy to eggs. Just recently I've been getting groggy after eating eggs, and from everything I've read, it's probably a sign of some gut health issues. I'm taking a probiotic now, eating more fermented foods like kimchi and sauerkraut, and staying away from anything processed. After just over a week with these probiotic foods, my egg issues are gone.


For people interested in learning more, check out Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride. She runs a clinic set up to treat people with Gut and Psychology syndrome or Gut and Physiology syndrome (both are called GAPs). There are some miraculous stories of people, children in particular, recovering from diseases that would normally have them throwing back bottles of pills to manage their symptoms without treating the causes. The ones that interest me the most are the children recovering from learning disorders, and mental health problems.  The rise of autism over the past thirty years coincides so perfectly with the advice from nutritional agencies to eat low fat, high carb diets that it is hard to believe there is no relationship between the two.  This research into GAPs seems to be hinting at refined carbs as having a direct influence on the rise of mental health disorders. In any case, kids recovering from learning disorders, and mental health problems is something we all want to see more of! The best part is that it is being done with nothing but real food. No doping the kid into la-la-land and sticking him in the corner of the classroom.

This stuff is a little different from what I usually talk about, but it all boils down to eating healthy food.  We don't pay enough attention to the quality of the food we eat, and we are paying the price.  We all remember a handful of classmates who were the "ADD kids". They needed all kinds of special attention, and worst of all, piles of medicine, but never seemed to get any better. What if all they needed was a better diet?

Posted on Monday, September 02, 2013 by Unknown

No comments

29 August, 2013

I'm changing things up again.  By now you must be thinking that I'm the most scatterbrained guy around. That's probably partially true, but I promise I have my reasons for switching things up.  I've come to realize that I made some mistakes with my 12 Week Challenge, and it's time to set things right.

For the past few months I've been working hard to lose fat, in the healthiest way possible. Being healthy has always been a big part of this for me. Lately I've begun to question my approach though. I have focused on restricting calories and exercising as much as my recovery would allow. Is this really the best way?


Something I read the other day made me rethink this whole concept.  If you are thrown off by all the talk of caveman diets, and paleo nutrition, I apologize, but bear with me while I explain my thought process. If one of our caveman ancestors (I like to picture Bam-Bam) was suffering from a lack of food (during the winter, or other times when food was hard to come by) would he be more active or would he be trying to preserve the energy he did have?  By exercising hard on a calorie deficit, this is exactly what we are doing.  There is no way little Bam-Bam would be out running hill sprints unless absolutely necessary.  This is the modern approach to fat loss though.  Reduce calories and exercise more.  How does our body respond to this situation?  Well, first it takes energy away from what it considers to be non-essential, like the reproductive system, and gives that energy to the brain.  No need to be making babies if you don't have enough brain power to maintain sensible thoughts...memories of Saturday night? The second thing the body does is hang on for dear life to the fat stores you do have left. There is a hormone called leptin that takes messages from our fat cells and controls fat storage accordingly.  When body fat gets low, and there isn't much food coming in, leptin freaks out and goes into fat storage mode.  By pushing yourself too hard while not eating enough, your body is going to start making all kinds of hormonal changes that you will not like.

The other problem I've noticed about restricting calories and focusing on macro nutrient targets is that I am becoming food-focused.  Eating should not involve math.  That's the bottom line.  We are supposed to eat healthy, natural foods until we feel satisfied, and then we stop eating.  I haven't gotten to the point of dreaming about cakes and cookies, but I think that I'm wasting a lot of mental energy on diet.  Also, a big part of hormonal health is stress control, and constantly thinking about food can result in a lot of underlying stress that I don't want or need.

You know that I'm always down to try something new and experiment on myself, so that is exactly what is going to happen.  The best part is that I already did a lot of the leg work during the 12 Week Challenge.  I have a pretty good idea about what kinds of food make me feel the best.  When I was doing the high fat/ low carb diet, I was killing it.  I had great energy levels, wasn't a moody jackass, and had the libido of a thirteen year old at the Playboy mansion. So, I'm switching back to that style of eating. No more tracking macros and weighing chicken breasts. I will still pay attention to the carbs that I eat, because they seem to have the biggest impact on fat loss (for me at least), but I am going to eat protein and healthy fats until I feel good and happy.  This may take some fine tuning, but that's part of the process.


Learning about nutrition is silly sometimes, because there are four thousand experts with ten thousand different philosophies.  It gets extra confusing because you can certainly get a great body without being healthy.  There are all kinds of nutritional experts who talk about treating body builders and other physique competitors after their shows.  In a lot of cases these people completely wreck their metabolisms, hormone balances, and develop eating disorders in an attempt to get down to super low bodyfat levels.  I'm not interested in becoming a train wreck with abs.

My thinking, and I may be completely wrong about all this, is that fat loss and muscle gain will happen naturally as a result of the work I do in the gym. I just need to change my focus to being healthy and start really listening to my body.  I will be sure to share everything I find out with you.  If it doesn't work, and I wind up a big fatty, you may not want to copy me on this one.

Posted on Thursday, August 29, 2013 by Unknown

No comments